Registration closed due to spam. Go to WWP if you are new

+ SocalAnon » Raid Planning and Reports » Los Angeles (Moderator: NoirAngeles)
|-+ Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding
Username:
Password:
News:

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Topic Tools  
Read November 28, 2008, 03:04:01 pm #0
Happy Smurf

Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

I have been made aware that some anons will be attending the Santa Claus Parade in Hollywood Sunday at 5:00pm in front of the HGB Building to "greet" the Galaxy Press float (GP's Vice-President is Rick Moxon's son, Brian) and the Scilon pole banners.

Following the parade, anons will be gathering at the cult's Winter Wonderland.
 
Read November 28, 2008, 04:50:27 pm #1
anonymony

Re: Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

I have been made aware that some anons will be attending the Santa Claus Parade in Hollywood Sunday at 5:00pm in front of the HGB Building to "greet" the Galaxy Press float (GP's Vice-President is Rick Moxon's son, Brian) and the Scilon pole banners.

Following the parade, anons will be gathering at the cult's Winter Wonderland.

Hollywood loves us, and this is an awesome chance to get out there and expose some of the bullshit "nice" stuff that $ci does.
 
Read November 30, 2008, 08:25:45 pm #2
Daisy St. Patience

Re: Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

Just be aware that pro-cult LAPD Officer Ricci told anons yesterday that any anon wearing a mask will be ordered to remove it and provide identification.

Nothing of the sort happened tonight, all reports say that the paraid was a success with all of our favorite handlers out to play.


Why hello, visiting Scientologist! Did you know:

Incident II is nothing more than the XENU story told in OT3?

OT8 = You mocked up your own past lives.

Enjoy your stay on SoCalAnon.com!
 
Read November 30, 2008, 11:05:18 pm #3
Happy Smurf

Re: Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

Untrue.

Orange was violently dog-piled and arrested at the parade. He was the only one wearing a mask although one anon had a scarf over his face and I had to pull him away from the clutches of a cop who was about to arrest him as well.
 
Read December 01, 2008, 01:47:54 am #4
Schnookums

Re: Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

Untrue.

Orange was violently dog-piled and arrested at the parade. He was the only one wearing a mask although one anon had a scarf over his face and I had to pull him away from the clutches of a cop who was about to arrest him as well.

There were anons present wearing Guy Fawkes masks...and didn't have any trouble.
They were nowhere near AO....so that should be considered.
 
Read December 01, 2008, 10:36:42 am #5
Daisy St. Patience

Re: Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

Untrue.

What's untrue for you is untrue for you.

The large group of anons by Longsign had absolutely no problems being and staying masked.


Why hello, visiting Scientologist! Did you know:

Incident II is nothing more than the XENU story told in OT3?

OT8 = You mocked up your own past lives.

Enjoy your stay on SoCalAnon.com!
 
Read December 01, 2008, 11:04:16 am #6
Happy Smurf

Re: Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

Daisy:

The anons you refer to were evidentally at a different location then was AnonOrange & the pack of Scilons across the street from the LRH Winter Wonderland (which was blocked off because of the parade grandstands) and who were aggressive towards him & AGP.

I was at the HGB and warned Orange & other anons to stay away from the Winter Wonderland area, but they chose to disregard my warnings. I had no problems whatsoever with anyone at the parade.

I wasn't aware there were other anons at the parade until I was told later by other anons. I didn't see them. My apology for any misunderstanding.
 
Read December 02, 2008, 10:42:58 am #7
AngryGayPope

I should not have been alone at wonderland

After being threatened by a jerk thank goodness a change of pace video I just uploaded from the day AFTER the stress test video. You can see more of the "creepy couple" Mr. burpee and his "galpal" who were setting me up.  I should not have been alone at their hive entrance but oh well, everything worked out great for me as I got threatened but not seriously hurt, the lapd screwed up yet I was not arrested. This legal case it cut and dried but the vid below ads more evidence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syZEFc6O8LM

This and most boards are thick with entheta. Don't run around in cyberspace enturbulating me and being polite in MEST. LRH said "Communication is the universal solvent." If you have problems with my behavior talk to me about it in a quiet, non-patty-fied area of a global raid. Or perhaps I should take up your criticisms of me with Patty and get her opinion.

Every obnoxious thing people are writing about each other is being snipped and clipped and cataloged by the cult legal eagles.

When I am in court with LAPD fighting the good fight over the bald goon they will bring up all your comments and say "anonymous hates him what is wrong with him your honor?"

If you are in court the cult will do something similar with what I say about you. Which is why I prefer talking at raids someplace you can't be bugged or lip read.


Mod Note: Don't double post Niggerfaggot


AngryGayPope.com
 
Read December 02, 2008, 11:35:41 am #8
Daisy St. Patience

Re: Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

AGP: While I like you, I don't like probably 65% of your behavior while at raids.

Simply put, you cross lines unnecessarily and it makes me cringe. You can probably actually see this in several raid videos.

I, and others, have decided to stop sitting on our hands about it. We will call you out in person and online - it's the nature of Anonymous and it always has been. Chanology does not reside within a hugbox.

This doesn't mean that we don't like you or don't support you in some way, or that we want to see you locked up. In fact, this flood of criticism is being typed with your best interest in mind. We don't want to see you in jail. We don't want to see you fail gamed. We don't want bad things to happen to you.

See where I'm going with this? You do some things right, and they're awesome... and then you go a bit nutty and that's when Christmas is inevitably ruined, again.

Seriously, AGP. You're awesome when you're cool, calm and collected. Be more like Fonzie.



Why hello, visiting Scientologist! Did you know:

Incident II is nothing more than the XENU story told in OT3?

OT8 = You mocked up your own past lives.

Enjoy your stay on SoCalAnon.com!
 
Read December 02, 2008, 12:01:26 pm #9
anonymony

Re: I should not have been alone at wonderland

This and most boards are thick with entheta. Don't run around in cyberspace enturbulating me and being polite in MEST. LRH said "Communication is the universal solvent." If you have problems with my behavior talk to me about it in a quiet, non-patty-fied area of a global raid. Or perhaps I should take up your criticisms of me with Patty and get her opinion.

Every obnoxious thing people are writing about each other is being snipped and clipped and cataloged by the cult legal eagles.

When I am in court with LAPD fighting the good fight over the bald goon they will bring up all your comments and say "anonymous hates him what is wrong with him your honor?"

If you are in court the cult will do something similar with what I say about you. Which is why I prefer talking at raids someplace you can't be bugged or lip read.


Please, please, please - QUIT FUCKING QUOTING THE MANIAC WHO STARTED THE CULT WE'RE TRYING TO DISMANTLE. It makes you sound like one of them, and we all agree they sound like idiotic robots..soo...

2nd - things that are said on chatboards, even when NOT anonymous, are not admissible in court. This is not evidence. These are words on a screen that don't count for shit out there in the real world. Chat logs & forums are much too easy to fake, edit, delete, etc. for them to hold any water in a court of law.
 
Read December 03, 2008, 05:20:50 am #10
AnonOrange

Re: I should not have been alone at wonderland

2nd - things that are said on chatboards, even when NOT anonymous, are not admissible in court. This is not evidence. These are words on a screen that don't count for shit out there in the real world. Chat logs & forums are much too easy to fake, edit, delete, etc. for them to hold any water in a court of law.

Why don't you go read Keith Henson's court transcripts:

http://www.operatingthetan.com/hensonind.html

EXHIBIT INDEX  DEEMED  IDENTIFIED AUTHENTICATED

 For the People:

  1 - Internet Postings  19
  2 - Internet Posting  26 37
  3 - Deposition of Keith Henson  41
  4 - Trial Transcript of May 6, 1998  41
  5 - Deposition of Keith Henson of July 13, 2000  41
  6 - Internet Posting dated July 7, 2000  42 51
  7 - Internet Posting  52 53
  8 - Internet Posting  53
  9 - Internet Posting  53 54
 10 - Internet Posting  54 55
 11 - Internet Posting  55
 12 - Internet Posting  57
 13 - Internet Posting  57 58
 14 - Internet Posting  58 63
 15 - Internet Posting  63 65
 16 - Internet Posting  66
 17 - Internet Posting  68 75
 18 - Internet Posting  68 76
 19 - Internet Posting  68 76
 20 - Internet Posting  68 76
 21 - Internet Posting  68 77
 22 - Internet Posting  68 78
 23 - Internet Posting  68 78
 24 - Internet Posting  68 79
 25 - Internet Posting  68 79
 26 - Map  134
 27 - G.P.S. Coordinates  130
 29 - Picture of secondary pedestrian underpass.. 156
 
Read December 03, 2008, 08:04:57 am #11
anonymony

Re: I should not have been alone at wonderland

2nd - things that are said on chatboards, even when NOT anonymous, are not admissible in court. This is not evidence. These are words on a screen that don't count for shit out there in the real world. Chat logs & forums are much too easy to fake, edit, delete, etc. for them to hold any water in a court of law.

Why don't you go read Keith Henson's court transcripts:

http://www.operatingthetan.com/hensonind.html

EXHIBIT INDEX  DEEMED  IDENTIFIED AUTHENTICATED

 For the People:

  1 - Internet Postings  19
  2 - Internet Posting  26 37
  3 - Deposition of Keith Henson  41
  4 - Trial Transcript of May 6, 1998  41
  5 - Deposition of Keith Henson of July 13, 2000  41
  6 - Internet Posting dated July 7, 2000  42 51
  7 - Internet Posting  52 53
  8 - Internet Posting  53
  9 - Internet Posting  53 54
 10 - Internet Posting  54 55
 11 - Internet Posting  55
 12 - Internet Posting  57
 13 - Internet Posting  57 58
 14 - Internet Posting  58 63
 15 - Internet Posting  63 65
 16 - Internet Posting  66
 17 - Internet Posting  68 75
 18 - Internet Posting  68 76
 19 - Internet Posting  68 76
 20 - Internet Posting  68 76
 21 - Internet Posting  68 77
 22 - Internet Posting  68 78
 23 - Internet Posting  68 78
 24 - Internet Posting  68 79
 25 - Internet Posting  68 79
 26 - Map  134
 27 - G.P.S. Coordinates  130
 29 - Picture of secondary pedestrian underpass.. 156


Woo, they're listed there...did you actually read the transcript as it pertains to those postings? There's quite a bit of back and forth about the admissibility of those documents.

OH. And that was in 2001...you don't think the laws pertaining to internet chat might have changed a little since then?

 
Read December 03, 2008, 08:30:40 am #12
anonymony

Re: I should not have been alone at wonderland

2nd - things that are said on chatboards, even when NOT anonymous, are not admissible in court. This is not evidence. These are words on a screen that don't count for shit out there in the real world. Chat logs & forums are much too easy to fake, edit, delete, etc. for them to hold any water in a court of law.

Why don't you go read Keith Henson's court transcripts:

http://www.operatingthetan.com/hensonind.html

EXHIBIT INDEX  DEEMED  IDENTIFIED AUTHENTICATED

 For the People:

  1 - Internet Postings  19
  2 - Internet Posting  26 37
  3 - Deposition of Keith Henson  41
  4 - Trial Transcript of May 6, 1998  41
  5 - Deposition of Keith Henson of July 13, 2000  41
  6 - Internet Posting dated July 7, 2000  42 51
  7 - Internet Posting  52 53
  8 - Internet Posting  53
  9 - Internet Posting  53 54
 10 - Internet Posting  54 55
 11 - Internet Posting  55
 12 - Internet Posting  57
 13 - Internet Posting  57 58
 14 - Internet Posting  58 63
 15 - Internet Posting  63 65
 16 - Internet Posting  66
 17 - Internet Posting  68 75
 18 - Internet Posting  68 76
 19 - Internet Posting  68 76
 20 - Internet Posting  68 76
 21 - Internet Posting  68 77
 22 - Internet Posting  68 78
 23 - Internet Posting  68 78
 24 - Internet Posting  68 79
 25 - Internet Posting  68 79
 26 - Map  134
 27 - G.P.S. Coordinates  130
 29 - Picture of secondary pedestrian underpass.. 156


Woo, they're listed there...did you actually read the transcript as it pertains to those postings? There's quite a bit of back and forth about the admissibility of those documents.

OH. And that was in 2001...you don't think the laws pertaining to internet chat might have changed a little since then?



OH! And another thing! I can't believe that out of all the court cases on earth that might have had something to do with internet postings, YOU REFER TO KEITH HENSON'S CASE. Didn't he represent himself? Maybe if he had had the good sense to retain counsel, and not be such a FUCKING MARTYR, things might have gone differently for him.

I'm one of the most compassionate people I know. The fact that I have absolutely zero sympathy for you should tell you something. You should look up humility in the dictionary, and maybe try to apply a little to your daily routine.
 
Read December 03, 2008, 08:36:07 am #13
EvilZoe

Re: Anons attending the Santa Claus Parade on Sunday in front of the HGB Buillding

AGP: While I like you, I don't like probably 65% of your behavior while at raids.

Simply put, you cross lines unnecessarily and it makes me cringe. You can probably actually see this in several raid videos.

I, and others, have decided to stop sitting on our hands about it. We will call you out in person and online - it's the nature of Anonymous and it always has been. Chanology does not reside within a hugbox.

This doesn't mean that we don't like you or don't support you in some way, or that we want to see you locked up. In fact, this flood of criticism is being typed with your best interest in mind. We don't want to see you in jail. We don't want to see you fail gamed. We don't want bad things to happen to you.

See where I'm going with this? You do some things right, and they're awesome... and then you go a bit nutty and that's when Christmas is inevitably ruined, again.

Seriously, AGP. You're awesome when you're cool, calm and collected. Be more like Fonzie.

As an outside observer, I would like to express my support for this sentiment.

AGP is capable of extreme awesomeness, but really needs to gain some control.

I'd like to be able to meet him someday without risking ridicule by more ferocious people....lol
 
Read December 03, 2008, 11:49:17 am #14
xenubarb

Re: I should not have been alone at wonderland

2nd - things that are said on chatboards, even when NOT anonymous, are not admissible in court. This is not evidence. These are words on a screen that don't count for shit out there in the real world. Chat logs & forums are much too easy to fake, edit, delete, etc. for them to hold any water in a court of law.

Why don't you go read Keith Henson's court transcripts:

http://www.operatingthetan.com/hensonind.html

EXHIBIT INDEX  DEEMED  IDENTIFIED AUTHENTICATED

 For the People:

  1 - Internet Postings  19
  2 - Internet Posting  26 37
  3 - Deposition of Keith Henson  41
  4 - Trial Transcript of May 6, 1998  41
  5 - Deposition of Keith Henson of July 13, 2000  41
  6 - Internet Posting dated July 7, 2000  42 51
  7 - Internet Posting  52 53
  8 - Internet Posting  53
  9 - Internet Posting  53 54
 10 - Internet Posting  54 55
 11 - Internet Posting  55
 12 - Internet Posting  57
 13 - Internet Posting  57 58
 14 - Internet Posting  58 63
 15 - Internet Posting  63 65
 16 - Internet Posting  66
 17 - Internet Posting  68 75
 18 - Internet Posting  68 76
 19 - Internet Posting  68 76
 20 - Internet Posting  68 76
 21 - Internet Posting  68 77
 22 - Internet Posting  68 78
 23 - Internet Posting  68 78
 24 - Internet Posting  68 79
 25 - Internet Posting  68 79
 26 - Map  134
 27 - G.P.S. Coordinates  130
 29 - Picture of secondary pedestrian underpass.. 156


Woo, they're listed there...did you actually read the transcript as it pertains to those postings? There's quite a bit of back and forth about the admissibility of those documents.

OH. And that was in 2001...you don't think the laws pertaining to internet chat might have changed a little since then?



OH! And another thing! I can't believe that out of all the court cases on earth that might have had something to do with internet postings, YOU REFER TO KEITH HENSON'S CASE. Didn't he represent himself? Maybe if he had had the good sense to retain counsel, and not be such a FUCKING MARTYR, things might have gone differently for him.

I'm one of the most compassionate people I know. The fact that I have absolutely zero sympathy for you should tell you something. You should look up humility in the dictionary, and maybe try to apply a little to your daily routine.

No, Keith did NOT represent himself. He had a lawyer, Jim Harr, who knew absolutely nothing about the cult and how it operates, and was obviously pretty useless altogether. Graham was out of the country at the time, and it is very hard to find counsel that will take on Scientology.
 
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
Jump to: